Although there is a substantial amount of research into the propensity of storage sites to leak CO2 over time, there is currently an insufficient number of studies addressing the health, safety and environmental (HSE) impacts of these unmitigated leaks (Stenhouse et al. 2009). The study done by Stenhouse et al. attempts to quantify the impacts of CO2 leakage on human health and safety by examining a scenario in which CO2 leaks directly into an enclosed dwelling, causing increased indoor CO2 concentration, and a scenario whereby CO2 leaks into a source of potable water, thereby causing lead mobilization. The model predicts that to meet Health Canada’s recommendation for indoor air CO2 concentrations, CO2 leakages into an enclosed house should not exceed 5.4 kg d–1. Further modelling indicates that aquifers containing unpolluted groundwater can tolerate a leakage rate of 1.7e-4 kg CO2 d–1 without mobilizing enough lead to exceed regulatory limits on lead concentrations in drinking water. A comparison of the two scenarios reveals that the health risks associated with leakage into drinking water occur with a lower level of CO2 leakage than do health risks associated with elevated CO2 levels in the home; thus regulators need to set limits on CO2 leakage using the numbers derived from the water scenario.– Shanna Hoversten.
Stenhouse, M., Arthur, R., Zhou, W., 2009. Assessing environmental impacts from geological CO2 storage. Energy Procedia 1, 1895–1902.
M. Stenhouse and colleagues at Monitor Scientific LLC generate their models determining maximum allowable CO2 leakage based on data from the Weyburn Midale CO2 Storage Project. To assess acceptable leakage rates into a dwelling, the model is based off of a small one-story house with a ventilation rate of 3.1 exchanges per day, and conservatively assumes that the entire quantity of leaked CO2 enters the dwelling as opposed to some of it getting stuck in the soil due to mass transport resistance. To identify the effects of CO2 leakage on groundwater, a model was used to simulate the acidification that would gradually occur with the addition of CO2 and the resultant mobilization of lead. Several simulations were performed to assess the varying impacts of the CO2 given the presence of a combination of minerals in the sediments, including calcite, goethite, and cerrusite.
The results derived for levels of CO2 leakage rates into houses allowable before health and safety becomes a concern were conservative, but relatively straightforward. The model for the water scenario was able to generate a number for how much additional CO2 could be leaked into the water supply, however, this figure was largely dependent on the variety and concentrations of minerals assumed to be in the aquifer sediments. The model demonstrates that with the addition of 0.01 mol calcite to the water, the change in concentration of lead over time is dramatically effected. Thus safe levels of CO2 leakage into potable water will be rather disparate across a range of sediment geology. Stenhouse et al. conclude that their analysis should be used to provide regulatory bounding limits on CO2 leakage rates, but that there should be a strong site-specific component to guard against over reliance on the model. Further, the paper goes on to suggest a number of areas that require additional research in order to gain a fuller understanding of the health, safety and environmental impacts of CO2 leakage from storage sites. Some of these topics include: the propensity of high CO2 concentrations to cause tree kills, the effect of intermediate CO2 concentrations over long periods of exposure, and the effect of heightened CO2 concentrations on underground microbial populations and the subsequent ecological consequences.
The consumption of fossil fuels since the industrial revolution has dramatically increased the amount of CO2 dissolved in the oceans, the effects of which have only recently fallen under the lens of scientific research. The Earth’s oceanic ecosystems are dependent on the balance between pH levels and dissolved carbonic compounds such as CO32-, aragonite and calcite, all of which are drastically effected by CO2 dissolution. Studies indicate that pH levels have dropped by about 0.1, (Feely et al., 2009) since the industrial era and will continue to drop in conjunction with a decrease in carbonic compounds in the decades to come. This change may eventually disable marine organisms’ ability to produce calcium carbonate shells.— Julia Levy
Feely R., Doney S., Cooley S. (2009). Present Conditions and Future Changes in a High-CO2 World. Oceanography 22, 36-47
Richard A. Feely and associates at the World Ocean Circulation Experiment/Joint Global Ocean Flux Study spent nine years conducting cruises to measure different carbon parameters in oceans throughout the world. Carbonate ion, aragonite, calcite, and pH are among the parameters that the researchers measured. They then used the National Center for Atmospheric Research to predict future changes in the aforementioned parameters.
Their findings indicate that the current pH of the oceans is 8.1 but will drop to 7.8 by the end of this century. Concentrations of CO32- are also projected to decrease drastically before the turn of the century. They are projected to drop low enough that the concentrations of aragonite and calcite in the oceans will become undersaturated (anticipated to occur 2020 and 2050 respectively). It is this decrease in carbon compounds that will make it difficult if not completely impossible for aquatic creatures to form calcium carbonate shells.
The mechanism by which the inability to form carbonate shells occurs through a series of chemical reactions. After CO2 in the atmosphere is dissolved into the ocean, it reacts with water to produces more H+ ions (decreasing the pH of the ocean). The newly available H+ ions react with CO32-, decreasing the concentration of CO32-. As mentioned before, this decreases aragonite and calcite concentrations, inhibiting the formation of calcium carbonate shells. The projections made by Feely and his colleagues indicate that this century is a pivotal time for humankind to decrease their CO2 emissions, or else marine ecosystems will be in danger as early as the year 2020.— Julia Levy